User talk:Mwarhead

Gigabits

I've copied the text into here. you should note the following when preparing for recreation.

There were three edit after your last, one of which removed external links considered by that editor as spammy.
prior to my deletion, it had already been tagged as shown in the text for both notability and advertising by other editors
If you recreate, I think the passages I've bolded in the text need reviewing - it's phrases like those that make it seem POV and advertising in style.

Good luck, Jimfbleak.talk.06:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

incidentally, I've deleted the first { in the tags so they don't show up in CSD, but if your recreation is essentially unchanged from last time, you ought to reactivate them. Jim —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jimfbleak (talk • contribs) 06:55, 13 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Wikipedia:Three-revert rule

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in LAN gaming center. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. -- Satori Son 00:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply by Mwarhead

The article was not reverted it was updated. You have reverted it 3 times, ban yourself.

LAN center article

Be very carefull reverting...if you revert more than 3 times in 24 hrs you will be blocked asap. just a heads up so you don't get blocked. 66.93.251.114 00:16, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from any site that uses the MediaWiki spam blacklist, which includes all of Wikimedia and Wikipedia. —Moondyne 00:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply by Mwarhead

Being warned by two seperate people for the same thing? LOL.

The article was not reverted it was updated. The moderators have unjustly reverted it 3 times, ban yourself.

combative behavior

If you continue your disruptive, combative and Uncivil behavior behavior, you will be blocked. Thanks! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 01:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lan center article

I have replied to your comments on the article. For the record I am an outside "moderator" or the proper term here sysop or admin. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 03:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your Q on my talk page

Please explain your reasoning as to why DMOZ should be linked in the article and why LanAtomic.com should not be linked in the article.

I have previously given my rationale at the article talk page and having nothing to add at this stage. —Moondyne 04:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yo Gigabits

Hey its Rob from The Vortex... got any good ideas at rewriting the LAN center article? Freakdomination 08:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]